Quark Pan vs Baidu Pan for downloads outside China: what we measured on real SVIP accounts
Two Chinese clouds dominate the links you get sent from China: Baidu Pan (pan.baidu.com) and, increasingly, Quark Pan (pan.quark.cn, Alibaba's). Both are painful from outside China for the same reason — a mainland phone number to register, and a throttle on free accounts that turns a 2 GB file into an afternoon.
We have run Baidu Pan links for people outside China for months. On 22 September 2026 we bought a Quark SVIP membership and measured it the same way we measured Baidu: same server (Finland), same day, real paid accounts, real files. Here are the numbers.
The short version
| Baidu Pan | Quark Pan | |
|---|---|---|
| Free account | 0.05–0.07 MB/s | 0.06 MB/s |
| Premium (SVIP), 1 connection | ~1 MB/s | 0.7 MB/s |
| Premium, 32 connections | 19 MB/s | 18 MB/s |
| Premium, 64 connections | — (32 is the ceiling) | 36 MB/s |
| Premium price | ¥30/month | ¥25/month (¥5.8 first month on promo) |
| Registration from abroad | +86 number needed | +86 number needed; Taobao login is a workaround |
| Can you read a share without an account? | No — needs a logged-in cookie | Yes — file names and sizes are public |
Both free tiers are useless. Both premium tiers are fast once you open enough parallel connections. Quark's ceiling was higher in our test.
How we measured
- Server: the same Hetzner box in Finland that runs our fetch service.
- Files: a 1.98 GB ZIP on Quark, a comparable ~2 GB file on Baidu (measured in August).
- Method: the file is split into N byte ranges and fetched with N parallel HTTPS connections, which is exactly how download clients like aria2 or BaiduPCS-Go work. Throughput is total bytes over wall-clock time, including stalls.
- Runs: 1, 12, 32, 48 and 64 connections on Quark; 1, 8, 16 and 32 on Baidu.
Quark Pan, in detail
| Connections | Throughput | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Free account, 1 | 0.06 MB/s | measured over 120 s |
| SVIP, 1 | 0.64–0.69 MB/s | two runs |
| SVIP, 12 | 4.9 MB/s | some connection timeouts |
| SVIP, 32 | 13.6 and 18.0 MB/s | two runs, both with a few timeouts |
| SVIP, 48 | 14.4 MB/s | timeouts dragged it down |
| SVIP, 64 | 36.4 MB/s | clean run, no errors |
Two things stand out.
The throttle is per account tier, not per connection. Free was 0.06 MB/s regardless of anything. SVIP scaled almost linearly with connections — about 0.4–0.5 MB/s per connection — until the clean 64-connection run hit 36 MB/s. Quark's download tokens carry a 51200 KB/s field (50 MB/s), so 36 MB/s from Finland is close to the ceiling.
Connection drops matter more than thread count. The 48-connection run was slower than the 32-connection run purely because a few connections timed out and stalled. Any client that fetches Quark from outside China needs per-range retries; without them, throughput is a coin flip.
Baidu Pan, for comparison
Numbers from our Baidu speed guide, same server, August 2026:
| Connections | Free | SVIP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.05 MB/s | — |
| 8 | — | 8.7 MB/s |
| 16 | 0.07 MB/s | 15.8 MB/s |
| 32 | — | 19.0 MB/s |
Baidu flattens out around 19 MB/s at 32 connections; going to 64 does not help. Quark kept climbing.
What this means if you just have a link
- A 2 GB file takes about 1 minute on Quark SVIP (64 connections) and about 2 minutes on Baidu SVIP (32 connections). On either free tier: 9+ hours.
- A 20 GB folder: roughly 10 minutes on Quark, 18 on Baidu — but folders with hundreds of small files behave differently (below).
- Neither is worth registering for to fetch one file. The account, the phone number and the premium payment (Alipay, which needs a passport to verify) cost more time than the download saves.
Small files: the opposite rule
We also tested a folder of 80 files averaging 28 MB on Quark SVIP, with the same 32 connections split three ways:
| Layout | Throughput |
|---|---|
| 32 files at once, 1 connection each | 10.5 MB/s |
| 8 files at once, 4 ranges each | 3.6 MB/s |
| 4 files at once, 8 ranges each | 4.1 MB/s |
Splitting small files into ranges is slower — the connection handshakes cost more than the bytes. Baidu behaves the same way (we learned that the hard way on a 13,230-file folder). Many files → many parallel files, one connection each. One big file → one file, many ranges.
Reading a Quark share without an account
One genuine difference: Quark share pages are readable without logging in. The share token endpoint returns file names and sizes for anyone, password-protected shares included once you supply the code. Baidu's share/verify requires a logged-in session even to see what is inside.
For a fetch service that means Quark links can be priced before any account is involved — and if the account ever breaks, quoting still works. For you it means a Quark link that "won't open" is almost always a dead link, not a login wall.
Where BaiduFast is on Quark
Quark support is live since 23 September 2026 on the same setup that serves Baidu links — fully automatic. Paste a pan.quark.cn link on the home page: you see the real size and price first, files under 150 MB are free, and the rest costs the same as a Baidu link. The Quark Pan guide has the step-by-step.
Measured 22 September 2026 on a Quark SVIP account and 24 August 2026 on a Baidu SVIP account, both from Hetzner Finland. If your numbers differ — especially from another region — tell us on Telegram and we will add them.
Paste the link on the home page — you see the exact size first. Free under 150MB, no account, direct or Google Drive link.
Download from Baidu Pan → Check if a link is alive (free)